PENCURI !!!
.
.
.
.
Gambar dari blog saya telah digunakan oleh mereka ini tanpa pengetahuan dan kebenaran saya ..
.
.
Dalam artikel
Focus: The divide that need not be
By KHAIRUL ANUAR BIN SHAHARUDIN
Read more: Focus: The divide that need not be – RED – New Straits Times http://www.nst.com.my/red/focus-the-divide-that-need-not-be-1.304066#ixzz2rpwvzVDZ
Siap buangkan tera air saya lagi!!
.
.
.
.
lapor, tangkap dan hukum.
tandanya your gambar sangat berharga.
oh mai
they are the expert in law for construction dispute
and yet
they are doing this???
sila ambil tindakan.
*no wonder masa terima klrca nyer notice..i felt a lilttle bit..err..mcm pernah ku tengok gambo ini…*
I’m soooo pissed! Pardon my language doc..
Kat internet memang boleh main curik2 je foto org lain ke doc?
Where do I begin.. hmmm…
Siap padam your watermark. Intention was clear.
Talking about divides between poor and rich. To prove that point by using your photo yg dia pi cropped out gambar kereta tu nak tunjuk tu rumah org miskin. Really? Draw le your own conclusion.
A lawyer pulak tu… need I say more?
Byk lagi nak share but not now. Takut nanti blood pressure I naik. We’ll talk when we meet ya.
I think doc letak le clause kat bawah setiap your entry like I did. Don’t know how effective it’ll be though sebab kena curik gak.
Or watermark besar sikit kot. Or besar2 tapi reduce opacity. Susah dan byk le kerja nak padam.
Last sekali, how on earth did you find out?!
Here’s some good readings:
http://skinnyartist.com/stop-stealing-my-images/
http://www.theguardian.com/media/greenslade/2013/nov/26/news-photography-medialaw
saman je, depa advertiser dan lawyer. sememangnya tahu undang-undang.
S A M A N
gambar saya pun pernah digunakan oleh penerbitan yang sama tanpa sebarang kredit diberikan atas gambar tersebut..
dapat diselesaikan secara baik tanpa ‘any monetary involved’…
at least some credit to the pix source should be ok..
anyway, you can contact/email the photo editor of the publisher and provides proof of ownership for the pix and ask for your rights
Ish ..lawyer tu….lawyer lulusan sekolah undang2 mana yang tak tau undang2 nih…
Sebagai seorg pengamal undang2 jugak, ish marah plak bila tgk fellow lawyers buat macam ni. Jahatnya!
Saya rasa, walaupun akak tak letak express copyright clause, tapi ada watermark, menunjukkan yang gmbar tu hak milik akak. Bila takde credit diberikan, ni memang dah salah guna!
Bak kata my journey my photo, bolehlah akak msg diorang bgtau n tanya. Lagipun, bila tgk surat khabar yang terlibat, tak terkejutlah sebab….
Amir pun ada jugak majalah guna gambar dia, depa buang juga water mark. Tak baik kan buat macam tu…
lawyer pong tak reti undang2?? marah ni
**&a@T746V XDWHT452Yda3621%$#@#^&*